Christopher Monckton, birther – Part IV

Words fail. Previous entries here, here, and here.


9 responses to “Christopher Monckton, birther – Part IV

  1. British satirical comedy at it’s best
    …oh, had it only been so…

  2. Daniel J. Andrews

    On the other hand it is good he’s around because people can point to him and say, “That is what is wrong with the Tea Party”. Hm, the the irony of the TP using an aristocratic upper class Brit as one of their icons just struck me (suppose I’m late to that particular bit of enlightenment).

    I assume you saw Trump’s tweets? I’d love to see those two on a tour together.

  3. Pingback: Monckton goes all out birther – A Few Things Ill Considered

  4. Commenter Joffan pretty nicely takes apart Monckton’s probability argument.

  5. Here are some thoughts on the election result from another prominent UK climate change “skeptic”.

    It is worth savouring in full but here is a brief extract.

    With four more years of Obama in the White House, Iran can now be sure that it will be able to complete its infernal construction of a genocide bomb to use against the Jews and the west. World War Three has now come a lot closer.

  6. Pingback: Decision Day. US Presidential election: Obama vs Romney - Page 171

  7. Chris is a grifter and the climate change thing is losing steam so he needs something else to maintain the lifestyle.

  8. Calling sustainability journalists and advocates everywhere to investigate the ‘no man’s land’ of human population dynamics. A cascade of ecological events with unforeseen consequences is occurring around us in our planetary home. There are multiple causes. But human overpopulation of Earth is the prime factor.

    Climate scientists are speaking out. Where are the population scientists? Why are they not more vocal?

    The deliberate silence among population scientists with unfulfilled responsibilities to assume and duties to perform with regard to their skillful examination and careful reporting of extant research on “human population dynamics” cannot be excused by the recognition that such woefully inadequate behavior “exists in all professions”. There is much too much at stake. Scientists have to stand up and consciously speak out about what is true to them, according the ‘lights’ and scientific knowledge they possess.

    Solzhenitsyn reported, “One word of truth overcomes the world.” Could it be that for the lack of one word, one word by people in possession of truth, as their lights and science indicate ‘what is’, the world and life as we know it is being destroyed before our eyes? As the sages of old said, perhaps it is time, finally, now and here to “speak the truth as if you are a million voices, for your silence is killing the world.”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s