New study shows cosmic rays cause global warming!*

*Or more accurately, once again, the evidence has been examined and falls decidedly short. Someone really should go buy poor Svensmark a drink. It’s been a rough couple of years for him:

The long term variation of the cosmic ray ionization rate has been studied. This rate shows a cyclic variation with a period of roughly twice the 11 year cycle for the data available since the 1950s. The structures seen in the variation of the long term cosmic ray ionization rate with time are shown to be present in the variation of the mean daily sun spot number, solar irradiance and in the variation of the mean global surface temperature. Hence we report a possible observation of a cyclical variation in each of these quantities of a similar period. The cyclic variation of the global temperature is found to be in phase with the solar cycle as measured from the sun spot numbers and the solar irradiance and in antiphase with the cosmic ray variation. However, the cyclic variation of the CR cycle is delayed by 2–4 years. This indicates that, if it is real, the correlation is most likely caused by direct solar activity rather than by cosmic rays.

The long term variations of each of the cosmic ray rate and the solar irradiance are observed to be less than their cyclic variations. Therefore, assuming that there is a causal link between either of them with the mean global surface temperature, the long term variation of the temperature must be less than the amplitude of its cyclic variation of 0.07°C. Hence within our assumptions, the effect of varying solar activity, either by direct solar irradiance or by varying cosmic ray rates, must be less than 0.07°C since 1956 i.e. less than 14% of the observed global warming.

Add this to your quivers for the next time the Inhofe-Morano/Watts/ICECAP crowd tries to float the cosmic ray claim.


3 responses to “New study shows cosmic rays cause global warming!*

  1. This is very odd because really CERN, Hadley Centre and the Max Planck Institute are saying that there is certainly something to this.

    The sun is radiantly fairly stable in human history and neutron counts don’t vary much between cycles. That is the very simple error made.

    But the cosmogenic isoptopes correlate well with climate and the mechanism is probably cloud effects.

    Look at Project Earthshine at the Big Bear Solar Obseravatory – for very significant cloud changes in the past few decades.

  2. Pingback: ConCERN Trolling on Clouds and Climate Change | The Way Things Break

  3. Pingback: ConCERN Trolling on Cosmic Rays, Clouds, and Climate Change

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s