- 1Sky: Palin advises Obama on shirking responsibilities
- Alaska Dispatch: Palin’s climate change op-ed
- Ambinder: Palin’s “Boycott Copenhagen” Op-Ed: Annotated
- The AtlanticWire: Washington Post Gets Burned for Publishing Palin’s Op-Ed
- Ben Smith: Palin’s climate change
- CapitalClimate: Pathetic Post Pimps Palin Propaganda
- Climate Progress: The Washington Post goes tabloid, publishes second falsehood-filled op-ed by Sarah Palin in five months — on climate science and the hacked emails!
- DeLong: Could we just bury the Washington Post now?
- Deltoid: The Washington Post can’t go out of business fast enough
- Enviroknow: WaPo Makes Exceptions to Op-Ed Guidelines to Publish Wildly Inaccurrate Sarah Palin Piece
- FDL: WaPost Publishes Palin OpEd on Climate Science, Michele Bachmann Piece on Quantum Mechanics to Follow
- The First Post: Washington Post slated over Palin’s climate rant
- Gawker: Sarah Palin’s Washington Post Op-Ed Debunked
- Get Energy Smart Now: Fred Hiatt jumps the shark in dragging Washington Post into the sewers: Publishes Sarah Palin OPED contradicted by links within the OPED
- The Intersection: Sarah Palin’s Bogus Climate Arguments Graduate From Facebook to the Washington Post
- Island of Doubt: Sarah Palin, edited
- Media Matters: Wash. Post publishes falsehood-laden Palin op-ed that is contradicted by scientists, temperature data, and… the Post itself
- Media Matters: Wash. Post lets Palin mislead readers on climate change
- Newser: Post, Palin Skewered for Climate Op-Ed
- John Petty: Sarah Palin has apparently written more op-eds than she’s read
- Nico Pitney: Sarah Palin: WaPo Faces Heat For Running Op-Ed
- The Swamp: Sarah Palin: Obama, boycott Copenhagen
- Think Progress: Washington Post Promotes Palin’s Denialist Op-Ed By Putting Science In Scare Quotes
- Washington Post’s own Joel Achenbach: Sarah Palin: Too much ice anyway
[UPDATE: More added as they come in.]
Pingback: Fred Hiatt jumps the shark in dragging Washington Post into the sewers: Publishes Sarah Palin OPED contradicted by links within the OPED
I’ve posted a few more:
Pathetic Post Pimps Palin Propaganda
The WaPo seems to be perfectly happy with George Will’s fact-free opinions on climate change. It seems unsurprising they’d be willing to publish Palin’s opinions as well.
At least there’s a slight chance that Slick Willy actually wrote what was published. This is a new low.
Sigh she thinks ‘hide the decline’ refers to a temperate decline. Yet later on admits that temperatures are increasing.
So did they conspire to hide the decline in temperatures or are temperatures increasing?
I know it is too much to ask for basic fact checking, but can’t an editor (or even an intern!) take two seconds and make sure an article doesn’t contradict itself?
I’m reminded of how Dennis Miller talked about losing Dan Quayle at the end of the first Bush Admin, it was like losing the Rosetta Stone of comedy. He was wrong. Palin is a more than adequate replacement.