Keeping up with Lomborg’s myriad misrepresentations of climate science can be exhausting, thankless work, so it’s nice to see delayed.oscillator obliterating his latest. Although I rather doubt anti-regulation propaganda organs like the op-ed section of the WSJ will stop printing his rubbish any time soon, media outlets who actually value their reputations might want to take note and avoid giving this serial obfuscator a platform to further spread his nonsense.
- .@BjornLomborg And most absurdly, arbitrarily cutting off at 2070 conveniently magicks away all cost of future warming beyond 2C. 20 hours ago
- .@BjornLomborg You said IPCC mit wld "very likely" cost 4% > doing "nothing"; actual central values 3.4% vs 1.1% *IGNORING ALL MIT BENEFITS* 21 hours ago
- .@BjornLomborg And that's annual, not cumulative. @theresphysics @simondonner @A_Siegel 23 hours ago