<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yes, Roy Spencer IS a creationist.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thingsbreak.wordpress.com/2008/07/28/yes-roy-spencer-is-a-creationist/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thingsbreak.wordpress.com/2008/07/28/yes-roy-spencer-is-a-creationist/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 04:44:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rick B</title>
		<link>http://thingsbreak.wordpress.com/2008/07/28/yes-roy-spencer-is-a-creationist/#comment-1658</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 04:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thingsbreak.wordpress.com/?p=221#comment-1658</guid>
		<description>Life was brought here by extraterrestrials a long time ago, creating lifeforms through genetic engineering. This is the demystified view of creation as seen by the bible. It makes way more sense than the idiotic and genetically unprovable theory of evolution. Leave climate and prejudice out of this...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Life was brought here by extraterrestrials a long time ago, creating lifeforms through genetic engineering. This is the demystified view of creation as seen by the bible. It makes way more sense than the idiotic and genetically unprovable theory of evolution. Leave climate and prejudice out of this&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: emretsson.net &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Sanning och lögn med Elisabet Höglund</title>
		<link>http://thingsbreak.wordpress.com/2008/07/28/yes-roy-spencer-is-a-creationist/#comment-548</link>
		<dc:creator>emretsson.net &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Sanning och lögn med Elisabet Höglund</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thingsbreak.wordpress.com/?p=221#comment-548</guid>
		<description>[...] evolutionsteorin (somliga forskare som är skeptiska till teorin om antropogen global uppvärmning gör det inte) verkar det mest troliga vara att de arter som uppkommit och ökat i utbredning under vissa givna [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] evolutionsteorin (somliga forskare som är skeptiska till teorin om antropogen global uppvärmning gör det inte) verkar det mest troliga vara att de arter som uppkommit och ökat i utbredning under vissa givna [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Man-Made Global Warming Skeptism by 650 - Page 18 - Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum</title>
		<link>http://thingsbreak.wordpress.com/2008/07/28/yes-roy-spencer-is-a-creationist/#comment-470</link>
		<dc:creator>Man-Made Global Warming Skeptism by 650 - Page 18 - Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 11:29:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thingsbreak.wordpress.com/?p=221#comment-470</guid>
		<description>[...] But, if you wish to emphasize his opinion in this matter, it is relevant to mention that Spencer is a known creationist.   [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] But, if you wish to emphasize his opinion in this matter, it is relevant to mention that Spencer is a known creationist.   [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Sloppy Science of Roy Spencer - Unconventional Sources</title>
		<link>http://thingsbreak.wordpress.com/2008/07/28/yes-roy-spencer-is-a-creationist/#comment-380</link>
		<dc:creator>The Sloppy Science of Roy Spencer - Unconventional Sources</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 02:26:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thingsbreak.wordpress.com/?p=221#comment-380</guid>
		<description>[...] The Way Things Break notes that Spencer has given public support to the pseudoscientific Creationist Intelligent Design ideology. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Way Things Break notes that Spencer has given public support to the pseudoscientific Creationist Intelligent Design ideology. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Talbot</title>
		<link>http://thingsbreak.wordpress.com/2008/07/28/yes-roy-spencer-is-a-creationist/#comment-113</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Talbot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 21:22:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thingsbreak.wordpress.com/?p=221#comment-113</guid>
		<description>For an idea of how his beliefs  effortlessly inform his approach to climate science, how about these -

&lt;i&gt;&quot;For most people, either you believe that the world has been created for mankind&#039;s use, with a certain resiliency and stability, or you believe it is just a cosmic accident, fragile, and overly sensitive to our meddling. The creator may be the biblical God; or as a scientist friend of mine believes, some as yet unrevealed Life Force. For many of those who don&#039;t believe in a creator, the spiritual need in their lives results in the uplifting of Mother Nature as the ultimate spiritual entity.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

and:

&lt;i&gt;&quot;It would be worthwhile for everyone to think seriously about what they believe mankind&#039;s role on Earth is, and how much influence over nature humans should assert. Since this is ultimately and inevitably a religious question, I fear that science will be misused in the effort to disguise it as a scientific one.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

http://www.tcsdaily.com/article.aspx?id=071604D

and  hilariously written without any self-awareness of the satirical effect:

&lt;i&gt;&quot;It wasn&#039;t long after I became a research scientist that I learned that scientists aren&#039;t the unbiased, impartial seekers of truth I always thought they were. Scientists have their own agendas, philosophies, pre-conceived notions, and pet theories. These views end up influencing their science. Nowhere does this have a greater impact on the science than in global warming theory.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

http://www.tcsdaily.com/article.aspx?id=020604C

Oh how I laughed! Though I guess it isn&#039;t funny, really.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For an idea of how his beliefs  effortlessly inform his approach to climate science, how about these -</p>
<p><i>&#8220;For most people, either you believe that the world has been created for mankind&#8217;s use, with a certain resiliency and stability, or you believe it is just a cosmic accident, fragile, and overly sensitive to our meddling. The creator may be the biblical God; or as a scientist friend of mine believes, some as yet unrevealed Life Force. For many of those who don&#8217;t believe in a creator, the spiritual need in their lives results in the uplifting of Mother Nature as the ultimate spiritual entity.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>and:</p>
<p><i>&#8220;It would be worthwhile for everyone to think seriously about what they believe mankind&#8217;s role on Earth is, and how much influence over nature humans should assert. Since this is ultimately and inevitably a religious question, I fear that science will be misused in the effort to disguise it as a scientific one.&#8221;</i></p>
<p><a href="http://www.tcsdaily.com/article.aspx?id=071604D" rel="nofollow">http://www.tcsdaily.com/article.aspx?id=071604D</a></p>
<p>and  hilariously written without any self-awareness of the satirical effect:</p>
<p><i>&#8220;It wasn&#8217;t long after I became a research scientist that I learned that scientists aren&#8217;t the unbiased, impartial seekers of truth I always thought they were. Scientists have their own agendas, philosophies, pre-conceived notions, and pet theories. These views end up influencing their science. Nowhere does this have a greater impact on the science than in global warming theory.&#8221;</i></p>
<p><a href="http://www.tcsdaily.com/article.aspx?id=020604C" rel="nofollow">http://www.tcsdaily.com/article.aspx?id=020604C</a></p>
<p>Oh how I laughed! Though I guess it isn&#8217;t funny, really.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elisabet Höglund och sanningen » emretsson.net</title>
		<link>http://thingsbreak.wordpress.com/2008/07/28/yes-roy-spencer-is-a-creationist/#comment-111</link>
		<dc:creator>Elisabet Höglund och sanningen » emretsson.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 21:34:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thingsbreak.wordpress.com/?p=221#comment-111</guid>
		<description>[...] evolutionsteorin (somliga forskare som är skeptiska till teorin om antropogen global uppvärmning gör det inte) verkar det mest troliga vara att de arter som uppkommit och ökat i utbredning under vissa givna [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] evolutionsteorin (somliga forskare som är skeptiska till teorin om antropogen global uppvärmning gör det inte) verkar det mest troliga vara att de arter som uppkommit och ökat i utbredning under vissa givna [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
